Largest mining farm to be built in the UK

The well-known UK tech company Bladetec is building the first large Bitcoin mining farm in Europe
20 March 2018   1818

Bladetec had already got an experience in IT support for NATO and the Ministry of Defence of the UK in the past. Today its idea is funded by investors in a limited company which is protected by UK law.

The facility - Third Bladetec Bitcoin Mining Company (TBBMC), situated on the Southeast of the country, is going to cover 3,500 square feet in three different places: in London, Suffolk and Surrey.

Today the company is raising £10 million from investors for building and operating the farm for up 2 years. The farm will become global and significant, also it is supposed to be introduced in the world`s top 25 and produce considerable return for shareholders (as a result of its dominant position).

The minimum investment to TBBMC project set by the company is £ 5,000 from each applicant. The project allows the capital growth up to even 45 % within a period of 2-3 years. The returns for the shareholders at that stage would be based on the Bitcoins sales`proceeds and the ASIC machines. If the price of Bitcoin does drop by 40 %, an investor may lose 22 % of his capital.

The company declared that it is going to mine 1,280 bitcoins within a period of two years. Nowadays it's difficult to predict how much those Bitcoins may be worth in two years. According to current prices, they will be valued at £ 7,8 million. But the situation may probably change before 2021. As for the raised funds, they would mostly be spent on the energy costs, despite the low energy bills' agreement between Bladetec company and the intended wind farm.

Bitcoin mining is more popular in the countries where the weather is cold (such as Iceland and China). The government of Iceland can implement a tax on mining because of the energy consumption. Chinese authorities insists on the ending of the cryptocurrency trading and mining in the country.

Israeli BTC Investors to Face Catch 22

They need to pay taxes from Bitcoin investing in order to avoid their property arrest, but banks don't take their money due to AML issues
06 August 2019   135

Bitcoin investors in Israel are faced with the impossibility of paying taxes, as local banks refuse to accept funds received from the sale of cryptocurrencies because of the risks of money laundering and terrorist financing. About this writes the local edition of Haaretz on August 6.

Bitcoin is not recognized as a currency in Israel, therefore, individuals must pay 25% of the income from cryptocurrency trading to the treasury, and legal entities - 47%.

Investor Ron Gross told the publication that he acquired bitcoins in 2011 and reported his income to the tax office. In 2017, the bank that served Gross began to refuse to accept funds received from the sale of bitcoins. The investor met with representatives of the bank to demonstrate to them a 70-page history of bitcoin transactions as confirmation of the origin of the funds, but failed to convince them.

The tax authority is aware of the problem, but they say the ball isn’t in their courts. I’ve tried working with almost all the banks, but the minute they hear the word ‘Bitcoin’ they freeze up.
 

Ron Gross

Bitcoin investor from Israel

 

Since Gross was unable to pay taxes on time, his bank account, home, and even scooters were arrested. According to the investor, the tax authorities know about the problem, but can do nothing.

According to Haaretz, the tax office is aware of $ 86 million in unpaid taxes on income from cryptocurrency trading. It is possible that the real amount may be significantly higher.

Roy Arav, another Bitcoin investor, kept the proceeds from trading Bitcoin in an account with Israeli bank Discount under the control of the Bit2C exchange. The bank refuses to transfer money to Arava’s personal account under the pretext that its politicians forbid it to transfer funds related to virtual assets to client accounts due to the risks of money laundering and terrorist financing.

Arav also could not pay taxes and was forced to sue the bank. According to the investor, the authorities entered his position and granted him a deferral of time for the consideration of the claim.