Оvercommit - convenient Git hook manager

Voldemar Duletskiy, Ruby developer, Evrone, Moscow Ruby Meet-up 6 report
01 August   771
Ruby

Dynamic, open source programming language with a focus on simplicity and productivity, it has an elegant syntax that is natural to read and easy to write.

Hello Ruby fans! Today we will talk about Overcommit - the convenient management of git-hooks.

Imagine that you have a small project with a micro-team of three or four people, including the manager. Deadline is near, but you cannot lower the quality of the code. You don't wanna use CI and there are no extra money for it.

What is hooks and where are they located?

It is the scripts that are executed at certain event. You can view all existing hooks by running the following command:

ls -la .git/hooks

You will see this listing:

-rwxr-xr-x   1 voldemar  staff  3755 28 Jun 16:39 commit-msg
-rwxr-xr-x   1 voldemar  staff  3755 28 июн 16:39 overcommit-hook
-rwxr-xr-x   1 voldemar  staff  3755 28 Jun 16:39 post-checkout
-rwxr-xr-x   1 voldemar  staff  3755 28 Jun 16:39 post-commit
-rwxr-xr-x   1 voldemar  staff  3755 28 Jun 16:39 post-merge
-rwxr-xr-x   1 voldemar  staff  3755 28 Jun 16:39 post-rewrite
-rwxr-xr-x   1 voldemar  staff  3755 28 Jun 16:39 pre-commit
-rwxr-xr-x   1 voldemar  staff   673  2 Jun 14:37 pre-commit.sh
-rwxr-xr-x   1 voldemar  staff  3755 28 Jun 16:39 pre-push
-rwxr-xr-x   1 voldemar  staff  3755 28 Jun 16:39 pre-rebase

Hook is an executable file, which can content anything, including the Ruby code.

Why it is cool?

  • You can put linters like rubocop to the pre-commit hooks. It will not allow you to commit substandard code
  • You can hang up rspec to the pre-push hooks, and if the tests are dropped - cancel code sending
  • If you are already actively using hooks - you don't need to drag them from one repository to another, they all lie in .ovecommit.yml in a convenient format
RuboCop

Ruby static code analyzer, based on the community Ruby style guide

If you suffer from dispersion and you are sick of messages from your CI that tests have dropped again, or the ruby-cop found a million syntactic violations (or your colleagues in the code-review process). If you are an experienced developer, a good set of hooks seriously discourages young developers and reduces your code-review time. 

Intallation

Gemfile:

gem 'overcommit'

Execude from the consol:

bundle exec overcommit --install

 Now let's edit .overcommit.yml file

PreCommit:
  RuboCop:
    enabled: true
    command: ['bin/bundle', 'exec', 'rubocop', '-R']
    on_warn: fail
  HamlLint:
    enabled: true
    command: ['bin/bundle', 'exec', 'haml-lint', 'app/views/']
    on_warn: fail
  ScssLint:
    enabled: true
    command: ['bin/bundle', 'exec', 'scss-lint']
    include: 'app/assets/**/*.scss'
    on_warn: fail

PrePush:
  RSpec:
    enabled: true

We can see here that the launch of the rubocop scripts is describled in nice forman. haml-linter, sccs-linter and tests runs just before the commit.

In order to enforce hook running this should be executed:

bundle exec overcommit -R

Now, with every attempt to commit something, checks will be performed firstly.

 

Underwater rocks

If there are a lot of tests or they are dropping randomly - if you already have a habit to brew coffee while test runs, it's better to chop the hook responsible for running the tests. If they fall randomly - fix the tests at last, damn it.

Integration with Rubymine - I have serious problems with the integration of Overcommit and Rubymine

Continuous Integration

The practice of merging all developer working copies to a shared mainline several times a day

Overcommit and CI integration - if you still decide to connect CI, then most likely it already provides validation for the code. Often, their rules don't match and you have to adjust the settings, for example Rubocop under CI, or vice versa.

You can skip hooks by running git commit --no-verify

Conclusion

Overcommit is an excellent utility for maintaining a project in good shape for small teams. It will allow you not to grab your head every time after creating a pool of the requester with exclamations "Damn, I forgot to use rubocop again!" or "Damn, all the tests fell!".

DateTime, Timestamp, Time and Date in Rails

Learn about key differenece between DateTime, Timestamp, Time and Date in Rails
31 October   445

The difference between different date/time formats in ActiveRecord have little to do with Rails and everything to do with whatever database you're using.

Using MySQL as an example (if for no other reason because it's most popular), you have DATEDATETIMETIME and TIMESTAMP column data types; just as you have CHARVARCHARFLOATand INTEGER.

So, main differences: DATE only stores a date, TIME only stores a time of day, while DATETIME stores both.

The difference between DATETIME and TIMESTAMP is a bit more subtle: DATETIME is formatted as YYYY-MM-DD HH:MM:SS. Valid ranges go from the year 1000 to the year 9999 and everything in between. While TIMESTAMP looks similar when you fetch it from the database, it's really a just a front for a unix timestamp. Its valid range goes from 1970 to 2038. The difference here, aside from the various built-in functions within the database engine, is storage space. Because DATETIMEstores every digit in the year, month day, hour, minute and second, it uses up a total of 8 bytes. As TIMESTAMP only stores the number of seconds since 1970-01-01, it uses 4 bytes.

You can read more about the differences between time formats in MySQL here.

In the end, it comes down to what you need your date/time column to do. Do you need to store dates and times before 1970 or after 2038? Use DATETIME. Do you need to worry about database size and you're within that timerange? Use TIMESTAMP. Do you only need to store a date? Use DATE. Do you only need to store a time? Use TIME.

Having said all of this, Rails actually makes some of these decisions for you. Both :timestamp and :datetime will default to DATETIME, while :date and :time corresponds to DATE and TIME, respectively.