Scammy ETH "Forks" to Steal Users' Private Keys

Ethereum Nowa (ETN) and Ethereum Classic Vision (ETCV) are new crypto scam projects
11 January 2019   367

Ethereum Nowa (ETN) and Ethereum Classic Vision (ETCV) fraudulent projects steal private keys from users, offering the latter to participate in the free distribution of coins. This is reported by the Cointelegraph.

There is no white paper on the Ethereum Nowa project site, however, the order of actions that users are invited to perform in order to receive ETN coins is described. In particular, they are advised to send a ETH to a specific address, then export the private key and receive forks using a special online tool.

The tool itself, proposed for obtaining coins, is a clone of the Ethereum wallet MyEtherWallet. It has a lot of design elements of a popular wallet, the only difference is in the domain.

Another scam project - Ethereum Classic Vision - has whitepaper. It says that hardfork will be held today, January 11, at 20:00 GMT. 

The analysis on the code performed by our team has shown that the piece of code provided actually sends your private key data on the Ethereum Classic Vision servers, masking it as an API token.
 

Guarda Wallet Team

The project website contains links to wallets under Windows and Linux.

Amberdata to Study Abnormal ETH Miners Rewards

As reported, unknown person mixed up the “gas price” field and “transaction cost”, left the workplace, and the bot did not work correctly
21 February 2019   83

The research startup Amberdata analyzed the activity of the Ethereum network in the last 24 hours and, like the media, found five transactions with an abnormally high commission.

It turned out that all five transfers were made from one address. Within four hours, the owner of the address paid the miners about $ 583,976 for processing transactions.

Note that the commission for block # 7,238,290 in the amount of 2103,1485 ETH, which was received by the Sharkpool pool, is the largest in the history of the network. Nevertheless, representatives of the pool temporarily froze funds in case the owner of the address made a mistake.

Amberdata is convinced that an unknown person mixed up the “gas price” field and “transaction cost”, left the workplace, and then the bot did not work correctly.