Temasek Not to Finance Bitmain

Another company denies information on investment in mining giant

04 September 2018 1079

The Singapore investment holding Temasek did not participate in financing the largest manufacturer of mining equipment Bitmain, is not going to participate in the IPO and never discussed this issue with the company.

We've seen commentary about an IPO involving a cryptocurrency company, Bitmain. Temasek is not an investor in Bitmain, and has never had discussions with, or an investment in Bitmain. News reports about our involvement in their IPO are false.

Temasek at Twitter

Twitter user BTCKING555, who became famous for publishing insider information about Bitmain's IPO, said that another announced investor represented by the GIC investment fund, founded by the Singapore government in 1981, is also not going to participate in financing the mining giant.

When Temasek exposes lying Chinese Mainland Company Bitmain HKEXGroup what about GIC ? Whose name Bitmain uses as investor in its deck and is on crunchbase Bitmain IPO GIC name is defrauded! Statement perhaps ?

BTCKING555

Earlier, the Chinese technology giant Tencent and the Japanese media corporation SoftBank denied info on their participation in the financing of Bitmain.

Mining Ethereum Blockchain

Amberdata to Study Abnormal ETH Miners Rewards

As reported, unknown person mixed up the “gas price” field and “transaction cost”, left the workplace, and the bot did not work correctly

21 February 2019 108

The research startup Amberdata analyzed the activity of the Ethereum network in the last 24 hours and, like the media, found five transactions with an abnormally high commission.

It turned out that all five transfers were made from one address. Within four hours, the owner of the address paid the miners about $ 583,976 for processing transactions.

Note that the commission for block # 7,238,290 in the amount of 2103,1485 ETH, which was received by the Sharkpool pool, is the largest in the history of the network. Nevertheless, representatives of the pool temporarily froze funds in case the owner of the address made a mistake.

Amberdata is convinced that an unknown person mixed up the “gas price” field and “transaction cost”, left the workplace, and then the bot did not work correctly.